There was a time when the IT department was responsible for keeping technology running. Today, that responsibility has expanded significantly.

IT teams manage infrastructure, cloud environments, SaaS applications, cybersecurity, access, compliance, vendors, digital transformation and increasingly, artificial intelligence (AI). At the same time, CIOs and IT Managers are expected to understand and control technology expenditure.

Then Finance asks:
“Why did the technology bill increase by R200,000 this month?”

And IT needs to have the answer.

The IT Mandate Has Expanded

Technology is now fundamental to almost every part of modern business. Cloud environments are growing. SaaS applications are multiplying. Cybersecurity requirements are becoming more demanding. AI is introducing new infrastructure, governance and cost considerations. Yet IT teams are expected to deliver more without necessarily receiving additional resources.

The modern CIO is therefore responsible for far more than technology. They are increasingly responsible for technology, security, risk, governance, innovation, AI and technology costs.

This makes effective IT cost management increasingly important.

Why Did the IT Bill Increase?

It sounds like a simple question. It rarely is.

A technology invoice can increase because of:

• Higher usage
• Supplier price increases
• Additional licences
• New services
• Expired discounts
• Contractual changes
• Unexpected charges

Finding the answer can become a manual exercise.

Billing data gets downloaded into Excel. Then come the pivot tables, VLOOKUPs, XLOOKUPs and nested IF statements. Before long, someone is staring at #N/A, trying to explain why the technology bill increased by R200,000.

The problem isn’t really Excel. It is technology cost visibility.

The Problem Isn’t the Increase. It’s the Explanation.

A R200,000 increase isn’t automatically a problem. If the organisation used more resources, added new services or deliberately expanded its technology environment, the additional cost may be completely justified.

The real problem is being unable to quickly explain why the cost changed. Finance needs confidence that technology expenditure is understood and controlled. IT needs to distinguish legitimate changes from unexpected or unnecessary costs.

Executives need a clear view of what is happening to technology spend. That requires more than knowing that the invoice increased. It requires understanding what caused the increase.

What Is Invoice Drift?

Invoice drift is the movement in technology costs between billing periods and, importantly, understanding what caused that movement.

JOLT’s Invoice Drift Tool helps identify where technology costs have changed and why. Instead of manually working through billing data, IT can focus on the areas that require attention.

The key questions are:

• What changed?
• Where did it change?
• Why did the cost change?
• Was it usage, pricing or something new?
• Is the increase justified?

Three fundamental drivers help explain invoice movement.

Higher Usage

The organisation is consuming more of an existing service. The question is whether the additional usage was expected and necessary.

Higher Unit Pricing

The organisation is paying more for the same or similar service. This could result from a supplier price increase, contractual change or expired discount.

New Items

Something has appeared on the invoice that wasn’t there previously. The question becomes whether the new charge is legitimate, expected and required.

From “The Bill Went Up” to “Here’s Why”

This is the difference between basic technology cost reporting and meaningful cost intelligence.

A traditional report might tell Finance:
“Technology spend increased by R200,000.”

But the next questions are obvious:

• Why?
• Which services?
• Which vendors?
• What changed?
• Was it usage?
• Was it pricing?
• What is new?
• Was the increase expected?
• Does it require action?

The real value comes from moving from:
“The bill went up.”

to:
“The bill increased by R200,000. Here’s exactly where the increase occurred, what caused it and whether it requires attention.”

That creates a much more productive conversation between IT and Finance.

Bridging the Gap Between IT and Finance

IT understands the technology. Finance understands the numbers. Both perspectives are important.

Finance needs enough context to understand why technology costs move. IT needs enough financial visibility to understand the impact of technology decisions. Effective IT cost management therefore requires more than another dashboard. It requires a shared view of technology expenditure.

When IT and Finance work from the same underlying information, the conversation can move from:
“Please explain this variance.”

to:
“We understand the variance. Here’s what caused it and what we need to do next.”

Give IT Back Some Time

CIOs and IT Managers should be focused on strategy, cybersecurity, AI, architecture, resilience, innovation and enabling the business. They shouldn’t need to spend hours manipulating spreadsheets simply to explain an invoice.

JOLT helps organisations bring visibility, governance and accountability to technology expenditure. The JOLT Invoice Drift Tool helps identify changes in technology invoices so IT and Finance can spend less time searching through billing data and more time understanding what those changes mean. Because IT already has enough on its plate. Explaining every unexplained line on the bill shouldn’t have to be one of them.

See the Invoice Drift Tool in Action

If Finance regularly asks IT to explain unexpected technology cost increases, there may be a better way.

Give us 20 minutes and we’ll show you how JOLT can help IT and Finance understand where technology costs are moving, what is driving those changes and where further investigation may be required.

No pivot table required.
No nested IF statements.
And hopefully, no #N/A.

JOLT | See • Act • Save